From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Sjöblom <robert(dot)sjoblom(at)fortnox(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation v3 |
Date: | 2023-06-14 03:54:46 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+Psiurr5_Rmu+i5R1xu=GAfOmbz2iejCi_uXkpg9tayXPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 1:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:57 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 2:53 PM Robert Sjöblom
> > <robert(dot)sjoblom(at)fortnox(dot)se> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached is the revised version.
> > >
> >
> > v4 looks good to me.
> >
>
> The latest version looks good to me as well. I think we should
> backpatch this change as this is a user-facing message change in docs
> and code. What do you guys think?
>
I do not know the exact criteria for deciding to back-patch, but I am
not sure back-patching is so important for this one.
It is not a critical bug-fix, and despite being a user-facing change,
there is no functional change. Also, IIUC the previous docs existed
for 6 years without problem.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-06-14 03:56:46 | Re: old_snapshot_threshold bottleneck on replica |
Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2023-06-14 03:53:54 | RE: Non-superuser subscription owners |