From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replace l337sp34k in comments. |
Date: | 2021-07-28 23:08:23 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PsGv27cV4+CY=8hrrM54p0i_E27CUdsBZ_WQ-hBu2h=0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:32 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 09:39:02AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> > IMO the PG code comments are not an appropriate place for leetspeak creativity.
> >
> > PSA a patch to replace a few examples that I recently noticed.
> >
> > "up2date" --> "up-to-date"
>
> Agreed that this is a bit cleaner to read, so done. Just note that
> pgindent has been complaining about the format of some of the updated
> comments.
Thanks for pushing!
BTW, the commit comment [1] attributes most of these to a recent
patch, but I think that is mistaken. AFAIK they are from when the
file was first introduced 8 years ago [2].
------
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/7b7fbe1e8bb4b2a244d1faa618789db411316e55
[2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53#diff-034b6d4eaf36425e75d7a7087d09bd6c734dd9ea8398533559d537d13b6b9197
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-28 23:49:17 | Re: CREATE SEQUENCE with RESTART option |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-28 21:37:24 | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |