From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: extension patch of CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER |
Date: | 2020-09-09 08:18:08 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PsBv+Drs2V-2YT42YnJBCqKvs2OdxFo=7tSReiHDd=j+w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:36 PM osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've fixed all except one point.
Thanks for addressing my previous review comments in your new v09 patch.
Those are fixed OK now, but I found 2 new review points.
====
COMMENT trigger.c (typo)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
+ errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for relation \"%s\" is a constraint trigger",
+ stmt->trigname, RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
+ errhint("use CREATE OR REPLACE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER to replace a
costraint trigger")));
Typo in the errhint text.
"costraint" -> "constraint"
====
COMMENT create_trigger.sgmg (add more help?)
I noticed that the CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION help [1] describes the
OR REPLACE syntax ("Description" section) and also mentions some of
the restrictions when using REPLACE ("Notes" section).
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html
~~
OTOH this trigger patch does not add anything much at all in the trigger help.
Shouldn't the "Description" at least say something like:
"CREATE OR REPLACE will either create a new trigger, or replace an
existing definition."
Shouldn't the "Notes" include information about restrictions when
using OR REPLACE
e.g. cannot replace triggers with triggers of a different kind
e.g. cannot replace triggers with pending events
What do you think?
====
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-09-09 08:43:53 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-09-09 08:08:06 | Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch |