From: | "Saha, Sushanta K" <sushanta(dot)saha(at)verizonwireless(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Watkins <rwatki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [E] RE: dual active 2-node cluster? |
Date: | 2018-04-16 14:07:12 |
Message-ID: | CAHty+vNFtxCJ9mc1KR0jY18WC-Axuct9CV8oF77E9x88pAbc6g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Checkout AWS PostGres "Read Replicas".
.... Sushanta
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ron Watkins <rwatki(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What about a hot standby mode where secondary node is receiving all
> transactions in real (or near-real) time?
> Is this doable? We have 2 physical nodes, not 3, so if we can do a
> hot-standby config with a load balancer configured in fail-over mode, that
> should work as long as no transactions are dropped and the secondary node
> is staying current (i.e. dual commit) with the primary node?
> Does anyone know if there are any links to how to setup such a config on
> the web?
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurenz Albe [mailto:laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 6:41 AM
> To: Ron Watkins; pgsql-novice
> Subject: Re: dual active 2-node cluster?
>
> On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 03:01 -0700, Ron Watkins wrote:
> > We are working to setup a production environment and as such one
> > requirement is to have as few single points of failure as possible. To
> > that end, I have been searching the web for how to setup a 2-node
> > cluster where both nodes are active. The goal is to allow both nodes
> > to service SQL requests (load/query) and have a load balancer in front
> of the database to allow for transparent outage and node recovery.
>
> You'd need synchronous replication, and if you do that with two nodes,
> you'll get low availability because any outage will take down the whole
> system. That's not a shortcoming, that's unavoidable.
>
> You need at least three nodes for decent high availability, particularly
> if you want load balancing.
>
> Look into Patroni for a high availability solution.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.
> cybertec-2Dpostgresql.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LR
> xpb6__0PomBTQ&r=JaNakyvP8b5eGvWhmxll6L4SNrrqHGq3Ghe3-Mb4Nezhm-
> 3SiJqFhK3ICb6tsog4&m=CdDQPWdvg6lmJUbeWWGbTE5QxEnJ2UxpVmbvwvyEgLE&s=
> Hxusi3pBXxW1QZhzJ-2T8a_y5ejI9QXlHmYvQoPs7b8&e=
>
>
>
--
*Sushanta Saha|*MTS IV-Cslt-Sys Engrg|WebIaaS_DB Group|HQ -
* VerizonWireless O 770.797.1260 C 770.714.6555 Iaas Support Line
949-286-8810*
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lorne Wanamaker | 2018-04-17 18:15:24 | Setting shared_buffers No Effect |
Previous Message | Ron Watkins | 2018-04-16 13:49:02 | RE: dual active 2-node cluster? |