Re: SSD Drives

From: David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Lists <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSD Drives
Date: 2014-04-05 06:22:31
Message-ID: CAHtT9Rty0eB5ob0060XS0w3EfVM7Tdc0k6m3X9f7qBTYUu4NeA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The real danger with consumer drives is they don't have supercaps and
> can and will therefore corrupt your data on power failure. The actual
> write cycles aren't a big deal for many uses, as now even consumer
> drives have very long write cycle lives.

Don't forget about the Crucial M500, M550 and Samsung 840 Pro - those
all have power loss protection, though have other drawbacks. The
Crucial drives in particular don't expose any sort of wear status
through SMART.

-Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anupama Ramaswamy 2014-04-05 10:48:29 streaming replication and recovery
Previous Message David Johnston 2014-04-05 00:32:01 Re: Remote troubleshooting session connection?