From: | jbiskofski <jbiskofski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Day, David" <dday(at)redcom(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michal Kozusznik <kozusznik(dot)michal(at)ifortuna(dot)cz>, "pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: making me love pgAdmin III |
Date: | 2017-05-19 17:50:36 |
Message-ID: | CAHpPzY7EPrg+2TtsL4Zac=Rbu8aXG6TNhSf64VOpPJO=-GpVmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
I think its a big improvement, but is still a little green. In a couple
more versions were all gonna love it.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Day, David <dday(at)redcom(dot)com> wrote:
> Ditto to MK's comment.
>
> Developers can somewhat tolerate this "alpha" state in pgadmin4. I would
> never push/recommend pgadmin4 to our customers.
> Someone indicated pg4 get 20 compliments for every negative, I would
> offer there's 19 that simply decided it was not ready, and did not give
> your any feedback.
> They just hope it continues to evolve, and pgadminIII continues to be
> available.
>
> It looks promising, good luck.
>
> Dave
>
> No matter how hard you push the envelope, Ulitmately it's just stationary.
> :+)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgadmin-support-owner@
> postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michal Kozusznik
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 9:30 AM
> To: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] making me love pgAdmin III
>
> On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote:
> > You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than
> release feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request
> You already know it is missing...
> > Maybe this news for You but people used this software for more than 10
> years - they got used to functionality - what we've expected was
> improvement (new features) not regress...
>
> Cannot agree more.
> Apart from discussion about chosen technology and related impacts
> (especially on user experience of desktop users), pgAdmin4 shouldn't be yet
> published as stable release. Since pgA4 remains feature-wise-incomplete
> comparing to pgA3, it should be called 'alpha'
> and therefore it shouldn't be offered as replacement of pgA3.
> In case it is intended to be something else than pgA3's successor, then
> shouldn't be called pgAdmin (to avoid confusion while comparing features).
>
> with regards
>
> MK
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Shapiro | 2017-05-19 20:07:33 | Re: making me love pgAdmin III |
Previous Message | Day, David | 2017-05-19 17:47:29 | Re: making me love pgAdmin III |