| From: | Kaixi Luo <kaixiluo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How safe is pg_basebackup + continuous archiving? |
| Date: | 2016-06-30 12:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAHo5iyjMYRdc4DEg6Mz6-WGP2OCZ9CfEydgoa9GetC_ZoCg2Kg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> Before replaying a backup on a production system, you would need a
> pre-production setup where the backup is replayed and checked.
> Honestly, you can only be sure that a backup is working correctly
> after reusing it. You could always do some validation of the raw
> backup contents, but you need at the end the WAL applied on top of it
> to be able to check the status of a server that has reached a
> consistent point.
>
Could you elaborate a bit more on this last part? If a PostgreSQL recovery
from a pg_basebackup reaches a consistent point and is able to start up
fully, that is not a guarantee that there hasn't been any underlying
corruption, as far as I know. Am I correct on this?
Thanks once again.
Kaixi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Sofen | 2016-06-30 12:42:02 | Re: Stored procedure version control |
| Previous Message | Chris Lewis | 2016-06-30 10:53:24 | Log archiving failing. Seems to be wrong timeline |