| From: | Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: temporary data after diskspace error |
| Date: | 2020-01-28 09:04:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAHnozTjnd+W5nDsbVeY=EtiuM_J6W1bVSNgU4sEEcc_K-CKDfQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I did the restart and it took seconds.
This was on a SSD.
BTW on ubuntu and debian i never use pg_ctl directly, postgresql-common has
a very nice CLI for this.
For the restart i used: sudo pg_ctlcluster --force 9.4 main restart
Thanks for all the good advice!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Will there be a lot of downtime to delete those 90GB of temp files?
> > Will postgres just delete those files without processing them or should I
> > brace for some downtime?
>
> It's just a directory scan and an unlink() for each file that has
> the right filename pattern to be a temp file. If you've got a
> reasonable filesystem I wouldn't expect it to take long.
> Maybe a minute? (but don't quote me on that)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Willy-Bas Loos
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Schwan | 2020-01-28 10:02:10 | Load Peaks on Standby/Replication Server using Luks/dmcrypt |
| Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2020-01-27 22:46:16 | Re: Need support on tuning at the time of index creation |