From: | Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: something better than pgtrgm? |
Date: | 2012-10-09 13:10:31 |
Message-ID: | CAHnozTj8tsOZOLRJO4Q798GtKVF9K0bbTYe+xzL-VZtxUQ7L-w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi, Andrew thanks for replying
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> But for the mixed languages case, surely it's not _any_ mixed
> language? Are you mixing Arabic, Farsi, Chinese, and Hindi, for
> instance?
>
We're mixing species names of birds in greek and latin (scientific names),
and all languages spoken in africa, europe and western asia.
>
> If not, then you're not really language unaware, but instead
> constrained by a subset of languages. That is a more tractable
> problem (for instance, you may not have to worry about direction
> changes, which vastly simplifies the problem).
>
I'm not very knowledgeable about scripts around the world, but i am afraid
that the above list does include scripts that read from right to left.
--
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2012-10-09 13:23:23 | Re: something better than pgtrgm? |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2012-10-09 12:18:09 | Re: something better than pgtrgm? |