Re: something better than pgtrgm?

From: Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: something better than pgtrgm?
Date: 2012-10-09 13:10:31
Message-ID: CAHnozTj8tsOZOLRJO4Q798GtKVF9K0bbTYe+xzL-VZtxUQ7L-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi, Andrew thanks for replying

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:

> But for the mixed languages case, surely it's not _any_ mixed
> language? Are you mixing Arabic, Farsi, Chinese, and Hindi, for
> instance?
>
We're mixing species names of birds in greek and latin (scientific names),
and all languages spoken in africa, europe and western asia.

>
> If not, then you're not really language unaware, but instead
> constrained by a subset of languages. That is a more tractable
> problem (for instance, you may not have to worry about direction
> changes, which vastly simplifies the problem).
>

I'm not very knowledgeable about scripts around the world, but i am afraid
that the above list does include scripts that read from right to left.

--
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2012-10-09 13:23:23 Re: something better than pgtrgm?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2012-10-09 12:18:09 Re: something better than pgtrgm?