From: | Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: journaling / time travel |
Date: | 2016-09-19 16:04:25 |
Message-ID: | CAHnozTi3X9GZUmzR2qYzNiVyQ1LM8-=-15sjnLLcGFqvzraqBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The use case of legal disputes being fought with our data as evidence and
> digging up the exact data from a certain point of time never occurred in
> those 10 years, and it is unlikely that it ever will.
> But it might, if anyone could reasonably expect this to be possible.
>
>
Just to clarify, this is not a specific feature that we are bound to in an
SLA, or anything like that.
It is just argued that we should keep the feature because a judge may ask
for it.
I'm not asking for official legal advice on this list, just for common
sense.
We are based in the Netherlands and any legal action of relevance to this
question would take place here.
Cheers,
--
Willy-Bas Loos
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Jungwirth | 2016-09-19 16:26:36 | Re: journaling / time travel |
Previous Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2016-09-19 15:48:20 | journaling / time travel |