From: | Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: number of rows in analyze |
Date: | 2011-08-01 16:02:34 |
Message-ID: | CAHnozThf=1LgD-bRmGtX6hooS9RGyYqej4n91P4vGLGpafot1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Ok, so 300 times the statistics target!
Thanks a lot for the exact code and formula!
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Why? This is purely an implementation detail. From the user's
> viewpoint, either the stats are good enough or they're not --- the exact
> number of rows sampled doesn't seem that interesting.
>
> regards, tom lane
Because the manual says that i can influence the number of rows that
are sampled by increasing the statistics target.
But i don't know how sensitive that value is, i want to know what it
is that i am about to do.
btw i don't like that the number of statistics records are coupled
with the number of rows sampled. it's not only confusing, it doesn't
seem optimal to me.
I guess i will look up the paper to find out more. I didn't make an
academic study about it (yet :P ) .
Cheers!
WBL
--
"Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all
others because you were born in it." -- George Bernard Shaw
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2011-08-01 19:26:37 | Re: snapshot backup with WAL files |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-01 14:49:59 | Re: number of rows in analyze |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-08-01 16:03:07 | Re: Postgres 8.0 upgrade to 9.0 |
Previous Message | Atul Goel | 2011-08-01 15:07:24 | Postgres 8.0 upgrade to 9.0 |