Re: doc minor glitch?

From: Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc minor glitch?
Date: 2012-02-22 11:04:20
Message-ID: CAHnozTgZHc8+ZqGDxTVuZ1Uxa5hkh7TKyr5izdwGy+viGHi=XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:33 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>wrote:

> hey, just noticed in the pg TOC on http://www.postgresql.org/**
> docs/current/static/index.html<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/index.html>
>
> chapter VI has roman numeral subsections, but V and VII both have decimal
> sections. thats not very consistent...
>
>
>
Not consistant, no. It does feel like a different *level* of documentation
somehow. It seems plausible to treat this section separately, but i am not
an insider on it.

If no-one answers anything useful here, you might want to try the
documentation list..
pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org

cheers,

WBL

--
"Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all others
because you were born in it." -- George Bernard Shaw

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gould 2012-02-22 11:10:34 python3 module for accessing postgresql
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-02-22 09:33:55 doc minor glitch?