Re: stats for network traffic WIP

From: Nigel Heron <nheron(at)querymetrics(dot)com>
To: Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stats for network traffic WIP
Date: 2013-10-23 18:44:24
Message-ID: CAHhq2wLF94Mw_nhxFGNhhT04va+DLcjL1415wA3RsbPRFfjxjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, thanks, I'm still actively working on this patch. I've gotten the
traffic counters working when using SSL enabled clients (includes the
ssl overhead now) but I still have the walsender transfers under SSL
to work on.
I'll post an updated patch when i have it figured out.
Since the patch changes some views in pg_catalog, a regression test
fails .. i'm not sure what to do next. Change the regression test in
the patch, or wait until the review phase?

I was also thinking of adding global counters for the stats collector
(pg_stat* file read/write bytes + packets lost) and also log file io
(bytes written for txt and csv formats) .. any interest?

-nigel.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com> wrote:
> I added this to the current CF, and am starting to review it as I have time.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________
> Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout Management
> | RR Donnelley
> 1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
> Office: 630.313.7818
> Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com
> http://www.rrdonnelley.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> Nigel,
>>
>> * Nigel Heron (nheron(at)querymetrics(dot)com) wrote:
>> > Hi, I've been using postgres for many years but never took the time to
>> > play
>> > with the code until now. As a learning experience i came up with this
>> > WIP
>> > patch to keep track of the # of bytes sent and received by the server
>> > over
>> > it's communication sockets. Counters are kept per database, per
>> > connection
>> > and globally/shared.
>>
>> Very neat idea. Please add it to the current commitfest
>> (http://commitfest.postgresql.org) and, ideally, someone will get in and
>> review it during the next CM.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Stephen
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Blackwell 2013-10-23 18:53:31 Re: stats for network traffic WIP
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-23 17:24:21 Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables