From: | Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures) |
Date: | 2018-02-27 16:38:21 |
Message-ID: | CAHg_5grWkuffXg=xkRJCE3oyagFGm5tiHTZEkqzq9Yr6ZRYNiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> I would just recommend users to use a version of psql matching
> the one of the server instead of putting an extra load of maintenance
> into psql for years to come
Breaking tab completion in new psql against old servers might be
acceptable as it's a fringe feature, but I don't think your
recommendation of matching versions is practical. Lots of people
manage multiple server versions and using the latest psql for all of
them is currently, as far as I know, a perfectly supported way of
doing that, getting new psql features and keeping compatibility. I
think it would be a pity to loose that.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-02-27 16:45:06 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= | 2018-02-27 16:27:39 | Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP |