Re: BUG #18310: Some SQL commands fail to process duplicate objects with error: tuple already updated by self

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18310: Some SQL commands fail to process duplicate objects with error: tuple already updated by self
Date: 2024-01-31 08:11:58
Message-ID: CAHewXNnm1vJYLYfq=bT22H2n_7BMXW7A2mBMeyvg-+2KTR+HCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Thanks for your work on this issue, and thanks for pushing it, again.

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> 于2024年1月31日周三 12:25写道:

> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:51:45PM +0800, Tender Wang wrote:
> > I refactor previes patch based on your suggestion, please review the new
> > attached patch.
>
> Thanks for the new patch. I've found the logic to be basically OK,
> minus edits with the structure, the routine names and some comments.
>
> Unfortunately, the set of regression tests was too shy because this
> only tested for the case of duplicated tokens when overridding
> mappings, while missing:
> - ADD MAPPING that failed on a constraint failure.
> - DROP MAPPING that failed with an deletion failure.
> - The case of IF EXISTS with tokens supported or not supported by a
> configuration's parser. That was not related to the report of this
> patch, but as we've discussed it is very easy to miss the historical
> distinction between the way this clause is handled.
>
> In short, there was zero coverage for these code paths. See
> DropConfigurationMapping() that was completely red, for one:
>
> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c.gcov.html
>
> This should be marked as covered pretty soon. I was also hesitating
> about the addition of a test with REPLACE, actually..
> --
> Michael
>

--
Tender Wang
OpenPie: https://en.openpie.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2024-01-31 09:56:00 BUG #18318: Different character codes are mixed in the log file in Japanese locale.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-31 04:25:11 Re: BUG #18310: Some SQL commands fail to process duplicate objects with error: tuple already updated by self