Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2017-09-05 17:14:57
Message-ID: CAHeEsBdpjgfTz1e0quLNm0a-c-X9sfvLC0b9YE2_NDaGtOvd0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I tested that with HEAD, but couldn't reproduce this problem. Didn't you
test that with HEAD?

Yeah, I know it's not an issue other people are having - I think it's
something specific about how my environment / postgres build is set up. In
any case I knew that it wasn't caused by your patch.

Thanks,
Ryan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-09-05 17:18:42 Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2017-09-05 17:09:22 Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands