From: | Ashkar Dev <ashkardev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, dave(at)davebolt(dot)co(dot)uk, Pepe TD Vo <pepevo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint |
Date: | 2020-03-07 20:21:32 |
Message-ID: | CAHaowgV-bt-pe2_ezHeEXE=X0q0K7N8dAmBcgUuq=bQ56-wfSA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Thanks for answers.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:55 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Ashkar Dev <ashkardev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> how to fix a problem, suppose there is a table with id and username
>>
>
> You should probably provide the definition though in this case it is
> self-evident that you are using bigserial.
>
>
>> So it doesn't start again from non-available id 1, so what is needed to
>> do to make the new inserts go into non-available id numbers?
>>
>
> Alter sequence
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-altersequence.html
>
>
>> and if the id reaches the limit and maybe there is some ids that are not
>> used.
>>
>
> This is highly unlikely.
>
> Is the subject line supposed to relate to this in some way?
>
> You should not worry about any of this in production; and frankly,
> worrying about it in development is largely pointless as well.
>
> There is no actual problem here to be fixed.
>
> David J.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-03-07 20:28:05 | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-03-07 19:55:02 | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-03-07 20:28:05 | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-03-07 19:55:02 | Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint |