Re: serializable master and non-serializable hot standby: feasible set up?

From: Jacob Biesinger <jake(dot)biesinger(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Clay Jackson (cjackson)" <Clay(dot)Jackson(at)quest(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: serializable master and non-serializable hot standby: feasible set up?
Date: 2024-10-16 19:24:32
Message-ID: CAHYXj6ecNTdHVmx-+4AZMx7SQ-Po6W09AoFsDT+QKdfXGxD9Hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> Just out of curiosity, what’s the use case for this?
>
>
We use the read-only replica as a data source for analytics workflows. The
setup allows us to have fresh data without affecting performance of the
production environment.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Biesinger 2024-10-16 19:28:04 Re: serializable master and non-serializable hot standby: feasible set up?
Previous Message Matthew Tice 2024-10-16 19:07:37 Re: What are best practices wrt passwords?