| From: | Jacob Biesinger <jake(dot)biesinger(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ghost data from failed FDW transactions? |
| Date: | 2024-08-28 22:19:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAHYXj6dTw4Xz8_ud3DqsJn8JiJNC9a9sazs7bsj1_=AvjgNhQA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> Any value in supplying a single insert statement a la (less back and forth
> perhaps?):
>
Yes, absolutely that would be better. This particular endpoint has some
ancient + crufty code backing it (migrated from a NoSQL DB with a
db-agnostic shim that we're slowly replacing). The old code likes doing
things client-side instead of being sane about SQL semantics.
But I don't think that would affect the issue here, right?
--
Jake Biesinger
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-08-29 01:54:57 | Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables. |
| Previous Message | Rob Sargent | 2024-08-28 22:16:08 | Re: Ghost data from failed FDW transactions? |