Re: New replica with pgbackrest

From: Aldo Sarmiento <aldo(at)bigpurpledot(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New replica with pgbackrest
Date: 2018-09-24 20:10:04
Message-ID: CAHX=r6z4=zq-N6mdVHG5DVs+n0PRXBdmjxwm+WSrrToyfXcj6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Yep it was indeed the hot_standby. Working now.

Thanks!

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:06 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> Hi Aldo,
>
> On 9/23/18 11:53 AM, Aldo Sarmiento wrote:
> >
> > # (REPLICA) tail -n 100 -f /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.4-main.log
> > 2018-09-23 10:22:14.111 P00 INFO: unable to find
> > 0000000100000CB600000053 in the archive
> > 2018-09-23 10:22:14.111 P00 INFO: got WAL segment
> 0000000100000CB600000053
> > 2018-09-23 10:22:14.111 P00 INFO: archive-get command end: aborted
> > with exception [001]
>
> This is a known issue in 2.05. It will report an error at INFO level
> when a WAL segment is not found, but is otherwise harmless.
>
> > 2018-09-23 10:27:57.129 CDT [10139-2]: bpd_production postgres(at)[local]
> > 57P03 [unknown] FATAL: the database system is starting up
>
> Are you sure `hot_standby=on` on the standby? I don't see it in your
> configuration.
>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-25 17:53:49 Re: Reversing pg_logical replication
Previous Message David Steele 2018-09-24 20:06:05 Re: New replica with pgbackrest