Re: Using a single sequence for all tables

From: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using a single sequence for all tables
Date: 2021-09-29 16:21:00
Message-ID: CAHOFxGq9OF4UOnHZYCvTgaZZGAjaUMewfCrGjNyz2XfdAA_xPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If your processes somehow allow updates on the wrong table, then fix that.

If you run out of space in whatever value range you choose initially, the
pain to upgrade to a type that allows larger values would seem to be very
large.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amine Tengilimoglu 2021-09-29 17:00:09 ERROR: unrecognized node type
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-09-29 10:18:47 Re: Using a single sequence for all tables