Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append

From: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
Date: 2020-11-25 20:05:33
Message-ID: CAHOFxGo65RmCSdrkV0HvgRc7_mPEQZng4Mh63AXY-YVxrRR69A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

What have you tried? Changing the relevant cost parameters I assume?
Nothing else going on that may be taking up those workers, right?

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-PARALLEL-SETUP-COST

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Phillips 2020-11-25 20:43:14 limit of data type character varying
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-25 19:18:57 Re: postgres_fdw insert extremely slow