Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries

From: David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries
Date: 2024-04-04 16:12:18
Message-ID: CAHM0NXi19okhdByr6cNDwqHtjG7umjbY5OmRMwgropZHs01KGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:32 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 03.04.24 19:16, David Christensen wrote:
> > I removed _() in the output of the query/stars since there'd be no
> > sensible existing translations for the constructed string, which
> > included the query string itself. If we need it for the "QUERY"
> > string, this could be added fairly easily, but the existing piece
> > would have been nonsensical and never used in practice.
>
> "QUERY" is currently translated. Your patch loses that.

I see; enclosed is v5 which fixes this.

The effective diff from the last one is:

- char *label = "QUERY";
+ char *label = _("QUERY");

and

- label = psprintf("QUERY (\\%s)", curcmd);
+ label = psprintf(_("QUERY (\\%s)"), curcmd);

Best,

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Improve-SQL-comments-on-echo-hidden-output.patch application/octet-stream 21.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-04-04 16:13:04 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-04 16:04:45 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser