Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries

From: David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries
Date: 2024-06-11 22:54:34
Message-ID: CAHM0NXhzU4oZJ00VUvbDL9gLoW2xUTLKZphoRCL3QWLGh5GE7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:12 AM David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:32 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 03.04.24 19:16, David Christensen wrote:
> > > I removed _() in the output of the query/stars since there'd be no
> > > sensible existing translations for the constructed string, which
> > > included the query string itself. If we need it for the "QUERY"
> > > string, this could be added fairly easily, but the existing piece
> > > would have been nonsensical and never used in practice.
> >
> > "QUERY" is currently translated. Your patch loses that.
>
> I see; enclosed is v5 which fixes this.
>
> The effective diff from the last one is:
>
> - char *label = "QUERY";
> + char *label = _("QUERY");
>
> and
>
> - label = psprintf("QUERY (\\%s)", curcmd);
> + label = psprintf(_("QUERY (\\%s)"), curcmd);

Any further concerns/issues with this patch that I can address to help
move it forward?

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2024-06-11 23:48:29 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Previous Message David Christensen 2024-06-11 22:52:43 Re: Reuse child_relids in try_partitionwise_join was Re: Assert failure on bms_equal(child_joinrel->relids, child_joinrelids)