| From: | Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Standby WAL Cleanup? |
| Date: | 2017-08-14 21:32:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAHJZqBDhthbVRfp+ojXd4FahAgcvm95eSA=uze1AszPceY9dnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
wrote:
> 2017-08-14 23:08 GMT+02:00 Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>:
>>
>> However on a standby, my understanding is that the archive_command
>> parameter is not used. I know for sure that it would fail on the standby
>> that I'm looking at.
>>
>
> Well, then, you need to check your facts :) Since 9.5, a standy can
> archive WAL files. See archive_mode and its "new" value : always.
>
Fair enough. The DB that I'm looking at is on 9.2. I'll definitely keep
this in mind as we plan to upgrade later this year. Thanks for the heads-up!
Don.
--
Don Seiler
www.seiler.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Kamenik | 2017-08-15 05:57:12 | Re: avoiding split brain with repmgr |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2017-08-14 21:26:36 | Re: Standby WAL Cleanup? |