From: | Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: 2 process postgres -D for one instance |
Date: | 2017-08-11 20:06:49 |
Message-ID: | CAHJZqBCEv2=HPui_tx82h_ZOg9mm5NX-b-g_uujZWQM2ZPRi_w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes exactly. That's the parent PID for that process.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 02:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
>
> some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
>
>
> exppgs *17769* 1 0 01:06 ? 00:01:04
> /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h
> bd-sillage.info.xxxx
> exppgs 39922 *17769* 0 15:39 ? 00:00:00
> /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h
> bd-sillage.info.xxxx
>
> It appears that the second one is a process forked off from the first
> one. That looks normal to me.
>
>
> Because of the reference to 17769 in the second entry?
>
>
--
Don Seiler
www.seiler.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui Pacheco | 2017-08-11 20:14:28 | How to make server generate more output? |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2017-08-11 19:44:13 | Re: Fwd: 2 process postgres -D for one instance |