From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode |
Date: | 2014-07-04 03:19:17 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHiMW4=rDiTjruwgB=CKFyENfBDBbY9fr92K7=TcFpi9w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:09 PM, <furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>>
>>> + if (secs <= 0)
>>> + secs = 1; /* Always sleep at least 1 sec */
>>> +
>>> + sleeptime = secs * 1000 + usecs / 1000;
>>>
>>> The above is the code which caused that problem. 'usecs' should have been
>>> reset to zero when 'secs' are rounded up to 1 second. But not. Attached
>>> is the updated version of the patch.
>> Thank you for the refactoring v2 patch.
>> I did a review of the patch.
>>
>> 1. applied cleanly and compilation was without warnings and errors
>> 2. all regress tests was passed ok
>> 3. sleeptime is ok when the --status-intarvall is set to 1
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch!
>
> I think that this refactoring patch is useful for improving source code
> readability and making the future patches simpler, whether we adopt
> your patch or not. So, barring any objections, I'm thinking to commit
> this refactoring patch.
Committed!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-07-04 03:53:27 | Re: Pg_upgrade and toast tables bug discovered |
Previous Message | gotoschool6g | 2014-07-04 02:47:06 | Re: Can simplify 'limit 1' with slow function? |