From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
Date: | 2016-06-30 12:35:27 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHY9c5zqtzxv4j0Wk3Uh9rOqaE5xabOL-N_+f4XZbszyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> (2)
>> +retry:
>> + SpinLockAcquire(&walrcv->mutex);
>> + if (!walrcv->ready_to_display)
>> + {
>> + SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
>> + CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
>> + pg_usleep(1000);
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> + SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
>>
>> ISTM that we will never be able to get out of this loop if walreceiver
>> fails to connect to the master (e.g., password is wrong) after we enter
>> this loop.
>
> Wouldn't it be cleaner to just return an error here instead of retrying?
I prefer to return NULL. Now NULL is returned when walreceiver's pid is 0.
We can just change this logic so that NULL is returned pid is 0 OR the
flag is false.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-30 12:41:19 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-30 12:30:19 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |