| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
| Subject: | Re: regular logging of checkpoint progress |
| Date: | 2011-09-07 03:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHDx-ru_JyuX1y_WxxvavJhBGRLWEQjYN1yV0tw+XqsiQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
> Several people thought a view or some-non-log option would be better.
+1
> Tomas
> replied "but I need to go back in time to post diagnose a problem", and I
> saw no replies to that.
You can go back in time if you periodically collect the information from a view
or some-non-log. Some tools (e.g., pg_statsinfo, Oracle statspack) have already
been doing that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Colson | 2011-09-07 03:40:08 | REVIEW proposal: a validator for configuration files |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2011-09-07 03:06:47 | Re: cheaper snapshots redux |