On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the walreceiver wakeups NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE=100 miliseconds in idle
> state. This is rather frequent. I don't really see any reason to do so.
> A nice fix would be to latchify that with WaitLatchOrSocket + a SetLatch in
> the signal handler for shutdown but that seems to be too invasive at that
> point. So I suggest simply increasing NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE to 500 or 1000ms?
Or calculate the sleep time from wal_receiver_status_interval in each
cycle and use it?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao