| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup and pg_stat_tmp directory |
| Date: | 2014-01-28 04:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwH5vQOGukSrk0SUDzv79oR8Q9MWn_7P6YXuBwo9GigwSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The files in pg_stat_tmp directory don't need to be backed up because they are
>> basically reset at the archive recovery. So I think it's worth
>> changing pg_basebackup
>> so that it skips any files in pg_stat_tmp directory. Thought?
> Skipping pgstat_temp_directory in basebackup.c would make more sense
> than directly touching pg_basebackup.
> My 2c.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking :)
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-01-28 05:11:59 | Re: pg_basebackup and pg_stat_tmp directory |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-01-28 04:41:07 | Re: Retain dynamic shared memory segments for postmaster lifetime |