From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_archivecleanup, and backup filename to specify as an argument |
Date: | 2015-07-03 12:56:20 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwH2HxzH9+GvDH888i35vNV_KajV04NrxGWxd-PLdRjvTw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I'm implementing the patch around pg_archivecleanup, I found
> the following warning about pg_archivecleanup in the document.
>
> Note that the .backup file name passed to the program should not
> include the extension.
>
> ISTM that pg_archivecleanup works as expected even if the .backup file
> with the extension is specified as follows. So, isn't this warning already
> obsolete? Or I'm missing something?
>
> $ pg_archivecleanup -d -x .zip myarchive
> 000000010000000000000009.00000028.backup.zip
> pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file "myarchive/000000010000000000000009" and later
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000005.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000003.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000001.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000007.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000006.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000004.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000002.zip"
> pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000008.zip"
Even in 9.2 where -x option was added firstly, I confirmed that
I could pass the .backup file name including the extension to
pg_archivecleanup program. So I'm wondering if the warning in
question was incorrect from the beginning...
Or am I missing something?
In the past thread of -x option patch, I found the following
Robert comment. This makes me think that we unfortunately failed to
notice his comment and finally added the unnecessary warning into
the document.
-----------------------------
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZDYD_W7K_S1ZuEnqVNOaRWYCX=EETX+R27VB7akrrcEQ@mail.gmail.com
Also, I'm wondering about this warning in the documentation:
+ extension added by the compression program. Note that the
+ <filename>.backup</> file name passed to the program should not
+ include the extension.
IIUC, the latest change you made makes that warning obsolete, no?
[rhaas pgsql]$ contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup -d -x .gz .
000000010000000000000010.00000020.backup.gz
pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file "./000000010000000000000010" and later
-----------------------------
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-07-03 12:56:43 | Re: BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment |
Previous Message | Marco Atzeri | 2015-07-03 12:31:34 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22 |