Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fine! I've committed the pg_clog renaming, but I'd really like to
>> draw the line here. I'm not going to commit the pg_subtrans ->
>> pg_subxact naming and am -1 on anyone else doing so. I think that
>> having the names of things in the code match what shows up in the file
>> system is an awfully desirable property which we should preserve
>> insofar as we can do so without compromising other goals. Not
>> invalidating what users and DBAs think they know about how PostgreSQL
>> works is a good thing, too; there are a lot more people who know
>> something about the directory layout than will read this thread.
>
> I'm cool with that, thanks for the commit.

monitoring.sgml still has some references to "clog". We should update them?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao