From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
Date: | 2017-03-18 18:03:37 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGUoeFwB313VHOQzvO_CckdmaPxqOUugz9uC1-cQdFqng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fine! I've committed the pg_clog renaming, but I'd really like to
>> draw the line here. I'm not going to commit the pg_subtrans ->
>> pg_subxact naming and am -1 on anyone else doing so. I think that
>> having the names of things in the code match what shows up in the file
>> system is an awfully desirable property which we should preserve
>> insofar as we can do so without compromising other goals. Not
>> invalidating what users and DBAs think they know about how PostgreSQL
>> works is a good thing, too; there are a lot more people who know
>> something about the directory layout than will read this thread.
>
> I'm cool with that, thanks for the commit.
monitoring.sgml still has some references to "clog". We should update them?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-18 18:12:31 | Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-03-18 17:37:31 | Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design |