Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index
Date: 2014-11-11 14:32:53
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGS=rszC4WYVPNOiXRXLaBvdtp-LgnBCSj14C+ToNv1mA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, so if there are no objections of others, I'll mark this as "Ready for
>>> Committer".
>>
>> I just pushed this. Thanks!
>
> Not to kibitz too much after-the-fact, but wouldn't it be better to
> give this a name that has "GIN" in it somewhere?

Maybe. gin_pending_list_cleanup_size? gin_pending_list_limit? Better name?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-11-11 14:42:25 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2014-11-11 14:28:08 Re: plpgsql plan changes causing failure after repeated invocation