| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Moving RestoreBlockImage from xlogreader.c to xlogutils.c |
| Date: | 2014-12-24 13:16:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGLpTAaMmbRs=cCJ39Kh1WJvWrYdiSMaV4XPO634Hg8YQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit 2c03216d has introduced RestoreBlockImage to restore a page
> from a given decoding state. ISTM that this is a backend-only
> operation but it has been added in xlogreader.c which could be used as
> well by frontend utilities like pg_xlogdump.
> Wouldn't it be better to declare it as a static routine in
> xlogutils.c? If we keep it in xlogreader.c, I think that we should at
> least wrap it with ifndef FRONTEND.
> Thoughts?
If we do this, pg_lzcompress.c doesn't need to be moved to common for
FPW compression patch which we're talking about in other thread. Right?
DecodeXLogRecord() seems also a backend-only, so we should treat it
in the same way as you proposed? Or pg_rewind uses that?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-12-24 13:41:56 | Re: Moving RestoreBlockImage from xlogreader.c to xlogutils.c |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-12-24 13:12:16 | Re: pg_basebackup fails with long tablespace paths |