From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) |
Date: | 2014-06-05 07:09:15 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGF5m6v_83CQ8MXHGcdzXN1U0iDfkUAfq-TryOORxBsJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>>>
>>> ANALYZE hs1;
>>> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
>>> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch for this.
>>
>> Why did you cut off the following part? ISTM that also needs to be back-patched.
>> So we should just do "git cherry-pick 2985e16" on 9.3.
>>
>> -begin transaction isolation level serializable;
>> +begin transaction isolation level repeatable read;
>>
>
> You are right, I did not pay attention to that at all.
> Please find attached = 2985e16 ;-)
Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2014-06-05 07:56:08 | Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2014-06-05 06:11:19 | Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) |