From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: new createuser option for replication role |
Date: | 2011-09-26 08:55:50 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwG=JxwUdqWrNbzDos_er1Pd25f=OW=wgMUUT7vSK54pTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2011/9/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Agreed. Attached is the updated version of the patch. It adds two options
>>> --replication and --no-replication. If neither specified, neither REPLICATION
>>> nor NOREPLICATION is specified in CREATE ROLE, i.e., in this case,
>>> replication privilege is granted to only superuser.
>>
>> Committed. Do we need to make any changes in interactive mode, when
>> we prompt? In theory this could be either wanted or not wanted for
>> either superusers or non-superusers, but I'm not really sure it's
>> worth it, and I certainly don't want the command to go into
>> interactive mode just because neither --replication nor
>> --no-replication was specified.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I believe the intereactive mode is useless.
Agreed. I think that a majority of "createuser" users are not interested
in REPLICATION privilege yet.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-09-26 09:08:15 | Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests are a no-go |
Previous Message | Jun Ishiduka | 2011-09-26 08:41:06 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |