From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: replication commands and index terms |
Date: | 2014-08-18 02:38:31 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFuN4Ekw7Av488=zCBLp5mrF9iEC5-87dpGQf4v6KTHbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Since I sometimes try to search the replication command in the index,
>>> I'd feel inclined to expose all those commands as index terms...
>>
>> +1.
>
> Attached patch exposes replication commands as index terms.
> Barring any objection, I will commit this.
Done.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-08-18 02:46:27 | Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-08-18 01:53:08 | Re: Why not ISO 8601 format for date values rendered into JSON? |