Re: replication commands and index terms

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication commands and index terms
Date: 2014-08-18 02:38:31
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFuN4Ekw7Av488=zCBLp5mrF9iEC5-87dpGQf4v6KTHbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Since I sometimes try to search the replication command in the index,
>>> I'd feel inclined to expose all those commands as index terms...
>>
>> +1.
>
> Attached patch exposes replication commands as index terms.
> Barring any objection, I will commit this.

Done.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-08-18 02:46:27 Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-08-18 01:53:08 Re: Why not ISO 8601 format for date values rendered into JSON?