| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm |
| Date: | 2019-04-15 15:14:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFPgV0P3wPaLeGxdxy_ijn=U1whkSGi5cNLusPK3404xA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Apr-12, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> > OTOH, originally I thought that the following style is smarter.
> >
> > xxx
> > configuration parameter, XXX
> > storage parameter, Storage Parameter
>
> Ah. Well, I like this style. Let's do that.
So I used <secondary> tag again for the above style if both reloption
and guc with the same parameter name exist. Attached is the updated
version of the patch. This patch also marks index-reloption as indexterm.
Barring any objections, I will commit this patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| reloption-doc-v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 33.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-04-15 15:35:36 | Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm |
| Previous Message | Jindřich Vavruška | 2019-04-15 04:16:15 | RE: Confusing information in sections 8.5 and 9.9 (date and time types, functions and operators) |