Re: description of CHECKPOINT command confusing

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: description of CHECKPOINT command confusing
Date: 2011-10-14 05:17:15
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFLdChsu1MyT1iuthNJP22iSYO6NiNy00K+Zdd6Du-efg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if there are other use cases during normal operation.
>
> If there's no real use-case for the command, I think the existing text
> of "not intended for use during normal operation" is fine.

Agreed.

>> It's helpful to link to that. What a "restartpoint" is explained in also
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/wal-configuration.html
>
> I wonder if it'd be helpful to break up that page into sub-sections,
> it is quite a large single section now. That might make it easier to
> link into that page for explaining restartpoint.

+1

> Slightly updated patch attached.

Looks good.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ray Stell 2011-10-14 14:02:48 after failover?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-13 16:17:41 Re: Typo on dummy_seclabel page