From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: description of CHECKPOINT command confusing |
Date: | 2011-10-14 05:17:15 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFLdChsu1MyT1iuthNJP22iSYO6NiNy00K+Zdd6Du-efg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if there are other use cases during normal operation.
>
> If there's no real use-case for the command, I think the existing text
> of "not intended for use during normal operation" is fine.
Agreed.
>> It's helpful to link to that. What a "restartpoint" is explained in also
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/wal-configuration.html
>
> I wonder if it'd be helpful to break up that page into sub-sections,
> it is quite a large single section now. That might make it easier to
> link into that page for explaining restartpoint.
+1
> Slightly updated patch attached.
Looks good.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ray Stell | 2011-10-14 14:02:48 | after failover? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-13 16:17:41 | Re: Typo on dummy_seclabel page |