| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? |
| Date: | 2014-09-10 12:06:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFDy9m_Drmg+c5jyNzbaU3izOOmmGGV7wdxPFQNO+_unA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> wrote:
> Re: Vik Fearing 2014-09-02 <5405D2D9(dot)9050801(at)dalibo(dot)com>
>> > Uhm, are we agreed on the decision on not to backpatch this? I would
>> > think this should have been part of the initial ALTER SYSTEM SET patch
>> > and thus should be backpatched to 9.4.
>>
>> I think it belongs in 9.4 as well, especially if we're having another beta.
>
> My original complaint was about 9.4, so I'd like to see it there, yes.
ISTM that the consensus is to do the back-patch to 9.4.
Does anyone object to the back-patch? If not, I will do that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-10 13:35:17 | Re: pgcrypto: PGP armor headers |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-09-10 11:38:04 | Re: pgcrypto: PGP armor headers |