From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive. |
Date: | 2012-07-02 17:19:19 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwF4=d8XpW5bwUTn=eanpg9E+t-FM_L597WcJ4adx8K5-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Make walsender more responsive.
>
> Per testing by Andres Freund, this improves replication performance
> and reduces replication latency and latency jitter. I was a bit
> concerned about moving more work into XLogInsert, but testing seems
> to show that it's not a problem in practice.
>
> Along the way, improve comments for WaitLatchOrSocket.
This commit makes the synchronous replication slow down very much
when wal_sync_method is set to open_sync or open_datasync. I think
the attached patch needs to be applied.
+#define WalSndWakeupProcessRequests() \
+ do \
+ { \
+ if (wake_wal_senders) \
+ { \
+ wake_wal_senders = false; \
+ if (max_wal_senders > 0) \
+ WalSndWakeup(); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
I'm not sure it's really worth doing, but isn't it good idea to test
max_wal_sender > 0 first to eliminate any CPU cycle in non replication case?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
bugfix_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 616 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-07-02 17:53:25 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive. |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2012-07-02 15:49:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-07-02 17:53:25 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive. |
Previous Message | Nils Goroll | 2012-07-02 17:19:18 | away soon - spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql |