From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: table partition and column default |
Date: | 2019-12-26 06:11:48 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEobDbrapZ7CDGx8tC3YLvLUVMoO426LGYdrqcFVwiSSw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:47 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:40 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:56 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > IIRC, there was some discussion about implementing a feature whereby
> > > partition's default will used for an attribute if it's null even after
> > > considering the parent table's default, that is, when no default value
> > > is defined in the parent. The details are at toward the end of this
> > > thread:
> > >
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/578398af46350effe7111895a4856b87b02e000e.camel%402ndquadrant.com
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that thread!
> >
> > As you mentioned in that thread, I also think that this current
> > behavior (maybe restriction) should be documented.
> > What about adding the note like "a partition's default value is
> > not applied when inserting a tuple through a partitioned table."
> > into the document?
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Patch attached.
>
> Thanks for creating the patch, looks good to me.
Thanks for reviewing the patch. Committed!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2019-12-26 06:37:52 | table partitioning and access privileges |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-12-26 05:47:21 | Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys |