Re: table partition and column default

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: table partition and column default
Date: 2019-12-26 06:11:48
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEobDbrapZ7CDGx8tC3YLvLUVMoO426LGYdrqcFVwiSSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:47 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:40 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:56 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > IIRC, there was some discussion about implementing a feature whereby
> > > partition's default will used for an attribute if it's null even after
> > > considering the parent table's default, that is, when no default value
> > > is defined in the parent. The details are at toward the end of this
> > > thread:
> > >
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/578398af46350effe7111895a4856b87b02e000e.camel%402ndquadrant.com
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that thread!
> >
> > As you mentioned in that thread, I also think that this current
> > behavior (maybe restriction) should be documented.
> > What about adding the note like "a partition's default value is
> > not applied when inserting a tuple through a partitioned table."
> > into the document?
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Patch attached.
>
> Thanks for creating the patch, looks good to me.

Thanks for reviewing the patch. Committed!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2019-12-26 06:37:52 table partitioning and access privileges
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-12-26 05:47:21 Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys