From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments |
Date: | 2015-02-17 03:18:41 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEmwRbAp24qV07ChtfeQS-6MfqVUWYkx5zj8TJZOe2RmA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2015-02-12 11:44:05 -0800, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > This obviously should not be the case. I'll have a look in a couple of hours. Until then you can likely just work around the problem by creating the archive_status directory.
>>
>> Thank you. Just let me know if you need some extra info or debugging.
>
> No need for debugging. It's plain and simply a (cherry-pick) conflict I
> resolved wrongly during backpatching. 9.3, 9.4 and master do not have
> that problem. That whole fix was quite painful because every single
> release had significantly different code :(. pg_basebackup/ is pretty
> messy.
> I'm not sure why my testsuite didn't trigger that problem. Possibly
> because a retry makes things work :(
>
> Somewhat uckily it's 9.2 only (9.3, 9.4 and master look correct, earlier
> releases don't have pg_receivexlog)
Are you planning to back-patch the fix to 9.2?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2015-02-17 03:43:55 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-17 02:46:46 | Re: We do not need pg_promote_v4_to_v6_addr/mask |