Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-04-08 04:26:01
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEiUeEArF0eCEY5Q5M+zcdnoRO0FLg7BcBDoCLwy9NBWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I pushed the patch!
>> Many thanks to all involved in the development of this feature!
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I spotted a couple of places in the documentation that still implied there
> was only one synchronous standby. Please see suggested fixes attached.

Thanks! Applied.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-04-08 04:42:05 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-04-08 03:55:26 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2