From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date: | 2016-04-08 04:26:01 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEiUeEArF0eCEY5Q5M+zcdnoRO0FLg7BcBDoCLwy9NBWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I pushed the patch!
>> Many thanks to all involved in the development of this feature!
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I spotted a couple of places in the documentation that still implied there
> was only one synchronous standby. Please see suggested fixes attached.
Thanks! Applied.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2016-04-08 04:42:05 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-04-08 03:55:26 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |