Re: missing PG_RETURN_UINT16

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing PG_RETURN_UINT16
Date: 2014-08-06 06:36:20
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEWCdJ-Yd_Lv7QJcVPJV=7tJTzuLqCB7MR52WB31Luu0w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de> wrote:
>> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
>> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
>> I guess it makes sense to to have it.
>>
>> here is the trivial patch for it.
>
> I see no reason not to add this. Anyone else want to object?

+1 to add that.

What about backpatch to 9.4? This is very simple change and there seems to
be no reason to wait for it until 9.5.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2014-08-06 06:49:18 Re: A worst case for qsort
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-08-06 06:31:26 Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode