From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index |
Date: | 2014-11-06 14:38:13 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEMK2VFx28oRhAPh3LvDNnCavNSe75hNtVoex=PptKFPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> IIUC, I think that min = 0 disables fast update, so ISTM that it'd be
> appropriate to set min to some positive value. And ISTM that the idea of
> using the min value of work_mem is not so bad.
OK. I changed the min value to 64kB.
> *** 356,361 **** CREATE [ UNIQUE ] INDEX [ CONCURRENTLY ] [ <replaceable
> class="parameter">name</
> --- 356,372 ----
> </listitem>
> </varlistentry>
> </variablelist>
> + <variablelist>
> + <varlistentry>
> + <term><literal>PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE</></term>
>
> The above is still in uppercse.
Fixed.
Attached is the updated version of the patch. Thanks for the review!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pending_list_cleanup_size_v6.patch | text/x-patch | 18.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-11-06 14:46:04 | Re: Repeatable read and serializable transactions see data committed after tx start |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2014-11-06 14:24:29 | Re: Repeatable read and serializable transactions see data committed after tx start |