Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-06-16 19:20:03
Message-ID: CAHGQGwE7qB6=eEx0=LOCD2P-bLUvcy1ppsiNQ7iiRUo5Ab2CYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached the latest versions of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY for the 1st
> commit fest of 9.4:
> - 20130606_1_remove_reltoastidxid_v9.patch, removing reltoastidxid, to allow
> a toast relation to have multiple indexes running in parallel (extra indexes
> could be created by a REINDEX CONCURRENTLY processed)
> - 20130606_2_reindex_concurrently_v26.patch, correcting some comments and
> fixed a lock in index_concurrent_create on an index relation not released at
> the end of a transaction

Could you let me know how this patch has something to do with MVCC catalog
access patch? Should we wait for MVCC catalog access patch to be committed
before starting to review this patch?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2013-06-16 19:25:35 Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2013-06-16 19:02:06 Re: Fix pgstattuple/pgstatindex to use regclass-type as the argument