From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Checkpointer vs pg_stat_bgwriter |
Date: | 2012-02-28 06:06:29 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwE+66oOE_4XbkR0PwsVH1uCWRuVbuzL7dvWLQNsgS1tew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I admit to not having actually tested this since I don't have a good
> cluster to test it on right now, but from what I can tell the code in
> the new checkpointer process only sends statistics to the collector
> once the checkpoint is finished (checkpointer.c, line 549). The 9.1
> and earlier sent this every time they entered a delay state (in
> BgWriterNap() called from CheckpointWriteDelay()).
>
> So in 9.1 and earlier we could see how a checkpoint wrote things as it
> was running, but in 9.2 we'll get it all as one big block at the end
> of the checkpoint - which can be a lot later in the spread case.
>
> Am I reading the code right?
>
> And if so, was this an intentional change, and if so why? To me it
> seems like a loss of functionality that should be fixed..
I agree that this should be fixed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2012-02-28 06:15:11 | Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results |
Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2012-02-28 05:05:13 | misleading error message from connectMaintenanceDatabase() |